After lecture proper, we were told to do another class exercise and experiment with framing by taking photos around the school. My partner and I set our subject on a little curvy walkway outside the LT, right smack in between 2 blocks (very random structure for a relatively “ulu” part of the school). Here are some of the many photos we took.
Bird’s eye view
Being amateur photographers, we decided to experiment with the rule of thirds and compare them to centre-framing from different angles.

Centre-framing

Line-of-third framing
Looking comparatively at the 2 photos above, I personally prefer the second photo. The centre-framing looks strange and I believe this can be attributed to the lack of symmetry in framing. The start of the walkway is curved and distracts the viewer from the subject which is the people walking further ahead. However, that said, although I prefer the second photo, the subject (in a checkered shirt) is too close to the railings and due to the visual complexity and hue similarity of both the subject the railings, it can be quite jarring aesthetically.

Canted low-angle off-centre

Low-angle centre
Like the centre-framing photo, the canted low-angle off-centre photo has details of the railings on the left that tends to make the photo look unbalanced. The photo is also at a canted angle which would be useful to create a sense of confusion. However I don’t think it worked for this particular photo. The placement of the subject is also weak as it is off-centre but not along the line of thirds. I prefer the second low-angle centre photo which has a sense on symmetry with equal details of the railings on both sides. The subject is distant but impactful due to its placement which I feel somewhat embodies the typical dramatic scene of the western hero riding into the sunset.
Looking again at the photographs, I realized that the little things, however small, like the trash bag in front of the structure (refer to “bird’s eye view”), can really be an eyesore. I suppose it’s the attention to detail that differentiates the good photographer and a great one. Hopefully, I will be able to make it point to pay attention to details while doing assignment 3 and not just be too obsessed with the framing.
So I left you with some food for thought in my previous reflection post.
The question was: Is this photo breaking the rule of thirds?

My photojournalism lecturer in another institution once said that as long as the eyes are in focus, the whole person would look in focus. He also said that the eyes should be used to fulfill the rule of thirds, not the whole person. In this particular photo, the subject’s eyes are slightly off centre (and so is the rose she is holding) so it seems as though the rule of thirds have been almost fulfilled. Except that it doesn’t exactly lie on the line of thirds.

Given how the rule of thirds is really the lazy scam to the Golden Mean, it really can sometimes be a rule to be broken. So although it looks like it followed the rule at first glance, it actually did break the rule if you look at it rigidly. But it doesn’t make it a bad photo, in fact I thought the framing was genius (intentional or not) cos lo and behold, guess what I realized?

The fibonacci spiral fit perfectly! Although this could be accidental (it probably is), it explains why the framing is so pleasing to the eye despite not having fulfilled the “lazy rule of thirds”!